Marking 100 years legacy of the founder of gerontology – Elie Metchnikoff – July 15, 2016

METCHNIKOFF FOR SITEToday, July 15, 2016, we mark 100 years legacy of Elie Metchnikoff (May 15, 1845 – July 15, 1916).  In addition to his ground-breaking achievements in immunology and embryology, Mechnikoff may be well considered the founder of modern scientific aging and longevity research, having proposed some of the first scientific theories of aging and some of the first science-based methods of intervention into degenerative aging processes as diagnosable and treatable medical conditions, and having coined the discipline of “gerontology”.

There is a tradition to celebrate the anniversaries of great persons (scientists, artists, writers, politicians, generals) to promote the area of their activity and popularize their ideology. It may be hoped that marking Metchnikoff’s legacy can serve to promote and popularize the science and ideology of healthy life extension, ameliorating aging-related ill health.

Last year, on May 15, 2015, in honor of Metchnikoff’s 170th birthday anniversary, there was held the international “Metchnikoff’s Day” campaign, with meetings and publications in several countries, in support of biomedical study of aging and longevity.

http://www.longevityforall.org/170th-anniversary-of-elie-metchnikoff-the-founder-of-gerontology-may-15-2015/

This year, Metchnikoff’s 100 years legacy, apparently is only marked in one place in the world – in Dvorichna settlement, Kharkov area, Ukraine, Metchnikoff’s birth area – where today Metchnikoff’s Museum is being inaugurated, with a special conference.

Yet we also seize this opportunity to once again honor the founder of modern longevity science, and use this occasion to emphasize the importance of this type of research for the global aging population. Looking forward to additional opportunities to emphasize this importance (for example during the forthcoming Longevity Day/Longevity Month campaign in October, following the UN International Day of Older Persons on October 1 http://www.longevityforall.org/longevity-day-and-longevity-month-october-2016/ ).

For your consideration, here are some additional materials on Metchnikoff’s day in 2015.

http://www.longevityforall.org/170th-anniversary-of-elie-metchnikoff-the-founder-of-gerontology-may-15-2015/

And more materials on the history of longevity science, including Metchnikoff’s foundational legacy.

http://www.longevityhistory.com/

 

Ilia Stambler

International Conference on Aging and Disease – Stanford – Sept 30 – Oct 2, 2016

Dear Colleagues,

The 2nd International Conference on Aging and Disease (2016 ICAD) will be held at Stanford University, CA, USA, from September 30 to October 2, 2016. The conference is organized by the International Society on Aging and Disease (ISOAD www.isoad.org). The conference Chair is the Dean of Stanford University School of Medicine. The confirmed speakers include many international distinguished researchers in the fields of aging and aging-related diseases http://isoad.org/content.aspx?info_lb=628&flag=103
The purpose of the conference is to create a forum for basic researchers and physicians to discuss current challenges in aging and aging-related disease. We believe that this conference will provide a platform that will help to fill the current gap between studies of the basic biology of aging and of aging-related disease. All information regarding the conference, including the conference site, speakers etc., can be found at http://isoad.org/content.aspx?info_lb=103&flag=103.

The first ICAD was held in Beijing in 2014, which was greatly successful. The report about the conference, entitled “Stop aging disease! ICAD 2014” was published in the ISOAD journal – Aging and Disease  http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2015.0115. Following the conference, the ISOAD position paper was published on “The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population” (translated to over 10 languages http://www.longevityforall.org/the-critical-need-to-promote-research-of-aging-around-the-world/). The special issue of 2014 ICAD will be published in Progress in Neurobiology (impact factor 10.3 http://www.journals.elsevier.com/progress-in-neurobiology). The forthcoming ICAD conference in Stanford is anticipated to be no less impactful both for the advancement of science and public support for biomedical research of aging and aging-related diseases, for the achievement of healthy longevity.
The Conference deliberations will be on the following topics:
Session 1:       Longevity Interventions
Session 2:       Stem Cells, Aging and Disease
Session 3:       Aging, Metabolism and Disease
Session 4:       Aging, stroke and Cardiovascular Disease
Session 5:       Age-Related Neurodegenerative Disease
Session 6:       Genetics, Aging and Disease
Session 7:       System Aging and Disease
Session 8:       Aging, Immune and Translation
Session 9:       Aging, Protein oxidation and Disease
Session 10:     DNA Damage and Disease
Session 11:     Public support for aging research

You are welcome to submit the abstract (http://isoad.org/content.aspx?info_lb=604&flag=103) as early as possible, so that after reviewing it would be easy for the organizing committee to guide you for further proceedings.

 

We hope to see you at ICAD 2016 in Stanford, on September 30 – October 2, 2016! Thank you for forwarding this announcement to colleagues!

On behalf of the ICAD 2016 Conference Organizing Committee
www.isoad.org

https://www.facebook.com/International-Society-on-Aging-and-Disease-ISOAD-763771300337299/

isoad@isoad.org

Det akuta behovet av att främja forskning om åldrande

The English version: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-english/

The Finnish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-finnish/

The Danish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/det-kritiske-behov-for-at-fremme-forskning-omkring-aeldning/

Swedish translation (by Johan Paulsson)

Det akuta behovet av att främja forskning om åldrande och åldersrelaterade sjukdomar i syfte att förbättra hälsa och livslängd för den åldrande befolkningen i Norden och globalt

Under de senaste årtiondena har den genomsnittliga förväntade livslängden ökat globalt, och nått ett genomsnitt på ca 70 år 2014 (6 år längre än 1990) sett till hela världen, jämfört med omkring 80 i industrialiserade länder (jämfört med ca 50 år i i-länderna i början av 20-talet). I de nordiska länderna – Finland, Sverige, Norge, Danmark, Island – är den förväntade livslängden bland de högsta i världen – en bra bit över 80. Även om den ökande medellivslängden återspeglar en generellt positiv mänsklig utveckling, så uppstår nya utmaningar. De härrör från det faktum att åldrande i sig själv är associerat med biologiskt och kognitivt förfall, även om graden och hastigheten av avtagande kognitiv förmåga , fysisk svaghet och psykiska funktionsnedsättningar kan variera individer emellan.

Degenerativa åldrandeprocesser är den huvudsakliga bakomliggande orsaken till icke-smittsamma sjukdomar (NCD), inkluderat cancer, ischemisk hjärtsjukdom, stroke, typ 2-diabetes, Alzheimers sjukdom, obstruktiv lungsjukdom med flera.
Åldrande ökar också risken för sjuklighet och dödlighet i infektionssjukdomar såsom lunginflammation och influensa. Dessutom ökar känsligheten för skada och trauma (såsom fall och hjärnskakning), på grund av försämringar av balans och mentala tillstånd, och även risken att falla offer för våld ökar kraftigt ökar med åldrandet. Även processerna för själva åldrandet förvärrar och förstärker effekten av andra riskfaktorer för icke-smittsamma sjukdomar (tobaksbruk, ohälsosam kost, fysisk inaktivitet, och skadlig användning av alkohol). Sammanfattningsvis är åldranderelaterat hälsoförfall den främsta orsaken till dödlighet och sjuklighet i hela världen och bör åtgärdas på grund av hur allvarligt problemet är. På grund av dessa allvarliga och negativa effekter betraktas åldrande redan som en av de största ekonomiska och samhälleliga utmaningarna som de flesta länder – särskilt i den industrialiserade världen – kommer att ställas inför under de kommande decennierna.

Utmaningen med det åldrande samhället har blivit allmänt erkänd och många forsknings- och utvecklingsprogram runt om i världen har initierats för att ta itu med åldersrelaterade sjukdomar. Men för närvarande är medicinsk forskning och utvecklingsarbete främst inriktat på enskilda sjukdomar som Alzheimers, hjärtsjukdomar, benskörhet, diabetes, cancer mfl. De underliggande degenerativa åldrandeprocesserna, avgörande för uppkomsten av dessa sjukdomar, är ofta mindre uppmärksammade. Nya riktningar inom forskning och utveckling använder ett mer holistiskt synsätt för att ta itu med degenerativa processer och negativa biologiska effekter av människans åldrande, tar itu med flera stora grundläggande orsaker till åldrande och åldersrelaterade sjukdomar på en gång och på ett sammanhängande sätt. Sådana metoder verkar mycket lovande, av följande skäl:
De stöds redan av vetenskapliga konceptbevis, som omfattar bevis för ökning av den hälsosamma livslängden i djurmodeller samt nya tekniska möjligheter att ingripa i fundamentala åldrandeprocesser. All förbättring av denna forskning kan ge kumulativa effekter och påskynda övergången från grundläggande studier till allmänt tillgängliga behandlingar.
Dessa kan ge lösningar på ett antal icke-smittsamma, åldersrelaterade sjukdomar, i den mån sådana sjukdomar starkt påverkas av degenerativa åldrandeprocesser (såsom kronisk inflammation, korslänkning av makromolekyler, somatiska mutationer, förlust av stamcellspopulationer mfl). Dessutom kommer de sannolikt att minska mottagligheten hos de äldre även för smittsamma sjukdomar på grund av förbättrat immunförsvar.
Det innovativa, tillämpade resultatet av sådan forskning och utveckling kommer att leda till hållbara lösningar för ett stort utbud av åldersrelaterade medicinska och sociala utmaningar, som kan vara globalt användbara. Den viktigaste av dem är de besparingar i sjukvårdskostnader för åldersrelaterade sjukdomar och ökning av den produktiva delen av livet för äldre personer. Dessa potentiella effekter gör denna forskning till den potentiellt mest lönsamma formen av allmän och biomedicinsk forskning.
Sådan forskning och utveckling bör stödjas av etiska skäl, för att ge likvärdiga vårdchanser både för de äldre som för de unga.
Därför är det samhällets plikt, särskilt för de yrkesverksamma inom biologi, medicin, sjukvård, ekonomi och samhällspolitiska organisationer att bestämt rekommendera ökade investeringar i forskning och utveckling som handlar om förståelse för de mekanismer som är förknippade med det mänskliga biologiska åldrandet och omsätta dessa insikter till säkra, prisvärda och allmänt tillgängliga tillämpade tekniker och behandlingar.

Därför uppmanar vi dig att ta upp med regeringen, eller någon institutionell krets där du är aktiv och inflytelserik, avsikten att skapa och genomföra följande strategier för att främja forskning om åldrandets biologi och åldersrelaterade sjukdomar, för att förbättra hälsan hos den globala åldrande befolkningen:
1) Finansiering: Agera för att säkerställa en betydande ökning av statliga och icke-statliga medel för målinriktad (translationell) forskning för att förhindra degenerativa åldrandeprocesser och tillhörande kroniska icke-smittsamma sjukdomar och handikapp, och för att förlänga det hälsosamma och produktiva livet.
2) Stimulansåtgärder: Att ta fram och anta lagar och regelverk som ger incitament för målinriktad forskning och utveckling som syftar till att specifikt behandla utveckling, registrering, administration och tillgänglighet av läkemedel, medicinsk teknik och andra terapier som kan komma att förbättra åldrandeprocesser och associerade sjukdomar samt förlänga det hälsosamma livet.
3) Institutioner: Agera för att etablera och expandera nationella och internationella samordnings- och samrådsstrukturer, program och institutioner som styr främjande av forskning, utveckling och utbildning på åldrandets biologi och associerade sjukdomar och utveckling av kliniska riktlinjer för att modulera åldrandeprocesser och tillhörande åldersrelaterade sjukdomar och förlänga den hälsosamma och produktiva livslängden för befolkningen.
Dessa åtgärder är utformade för att minska den ekonomiska bördan av åldrandeprocessen och för att lindra lidandet för de äldre och deras närstående. Sett till den positiva sidan, om det beviljas tillräckligt stöd, kan dessa åtgärder öka den hälsosamma livslängden för äldre, förlänga produktivitet, interaktion med samhället och öka känslan av njutning, syfte, jämlikhet och värdering av livet.

Nordiska länder – grundat på sina beprövade insatser för att öka den hälsosamma livslängden, sina enorma medicinska, vetenskapliga, sociala, ekonomiska och humanitära kapacitet – kan spela en ledande roll för att uppnå dessa mål i regionen och globalt.

Vi uppmanar er att använda tillfället för den Nordiska Kongressen i Gerontologi för att öka medvetenheten om problemet och främja målet att uppnå en ökad hälsosam livslängd för alla genom att stödja biomedicinsk forskning om åldrandet.

Se även: “The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population” Aging and Disease, 6 (1), 2015

http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2014.1210
http://www.longevityforall.org/the-critical-need-to-promote-research-of-aging-around-the-world/

Det kritiske behov for at fremme forskning omkring ældning

The English version: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-english/

The Finnish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-finnish/

The Swedish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/det-akuta-behovet-av-att-framja-forskning-om-aldrande/

Danish translation (by Poul Martin Jensen)

Vedrørende: Det akutte behov for at fremme forskning omkring ældning og aldersrelaterede sygdomme, og for at forbedre sundheden og levetiden for den aldrende del, såvel som resten af befolkning i de nordiske lande og globalt.

Gennem de seneste årtier er den gennemsnitlige levealder steget globalt, og nåede et verdensomspændende gennemsnit på omkring 70 år i 2014 (6 år længere end i 1990) og omkring 80 år i de udviklede lande (sammenlignet med omkring 50 år i de udviklede lande i begyndelsen af det 20. århundrede).

I de nordiske lande – Finland, Sverige, Norge, Danmark, og Island, er den forventede levetid en en af den højeste i verden, på godt over de 80 år, og selvom den stigende levealder generelt afspejler en positiv menneskelig udvikling, er nye udfordringer følgende opstået.

De stammer fra det faktum, at det at blive ældre er stadig uløseligt forbundet med biologiske og kognitiv degeneration, selvom sværhedsgraden og hastigheden af kognitiv tilbagegang, fysisk skrøbelighed og psykologiske lidelser kan variere mellem individer.

Degenerative aldrings processer er den væsentligste underliggende årsag til ikke-overførbare sygdomme (NCDs), herunder kræft, iskæmisk hjertesygdom, slagtilfælde, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimers, obstruktiv lungesygdom, og andre.

Aldring øger også risikoen for sygelighed og dødelighed fra smitsomme sygdomme, som lungebetændelse og influenza, såvel som risikoen for skader og traumer (såsom fald og hjernerystelse), på grund af svækkelse af balance og psykiske tilstand, og selv det at blive offer for vold, er en kraftig steget risiko for mange ældre i verden.

Endvidere forværres og forstærkes alderdomsprocesserne under virkningerne af andre risikofaktorer, såsom brug af tobak, usund kost, fysisk inaktivitet og skadelig brug af alkohol.

Kort sagt, alderdomssrelateret dårligt helbred, er den vigtigste årsag til dødelighed og sygelighed på verdensplan og bør behandles i henhold til problemets alvor.

På grund af disse alvorlige og negative virkninger, er aldring allerede betragtet som en af de største økonomiske og samfundsmæssige udfordringer, som de fleste lande – især i den industrialiserede verden – vil stå over for i de kommende årtier.

Udfordringen i det aldrende samfund er blevet bredt anerkendt, og talrige forsknings- og udviklingsprogrammer i hele verden er blevet indledt for at bekæmpe aldersrelaterede sygdomme, men mens medicinsk forskning og udvikling i øjeblikket fokuserer hovedsageligt på enkelte sygdomme, såsom Alzheimers demens, hjertesygdomme, knogleskørhed, diabetes, kræft, osv. bliver underliggende degenerative aldringsprocesser, bestemmende for fremkomsten af disse sygdomme, ofte overset eller tilsidesat.

Nye retninger i forskning og udvikling, tager en mere holistisk tilgang til at tackle de degenerative processer, og negative biologiske virkninger af menneskelig aldring, som omhandlende flere store fundamentale årsager til aldring og aldrings relaterede sygdomme, og interaktionen mellem dem. Sådanne tilgange er meget lovende, af følgende grunde:

De er allerede understøttet af videnskabelige forsøg, involverende bevislige forlænget sund levetid i dyremodeller, og de nyeste teknologiske muligheder for at gribe ind i grundlæggende aldringsprocesser.

Enhver forstærkning i denne forskning kan producere kumulative virkninger og fremskynde muligheden for bredt tilgængelige behandlinger i lignende områder.

De kan levere løsninger til en række ikke-overførbare aldersrelaterede sygdomme, for så vidt som sådanne sygdomme er stærkt bestemt af degenerative aldringsprocesser (såsom kronisk inflammation, cross-kobling af makromolekyler, somatiske mutationer, tab af stamcelle populationer, etc.) og det vil endvidere sandsynligvis også mindske risikoen hos de ældre mht. til smitsomme sygdomme, som følge af forbedringer i deres immumsystem.

De innovative anvendte resultater af sådan forskning og udvikling vil føre til bæredygtige løsninger for en bred vifte af aldersrelaterede medicinske og sociale udfordringer, der kan være globalt gældende.

Den vigtigste af dem er besparelserne i udgifter til sundhedsvæsenet for aldersrelaterede sygdomme, og at de ældre i længere tid kan tage aktivt del i samfundet.

Disse respektive effekter gør denne forskning potentielt den mest rentable form for generel og biomedicinsk forskning.

En sådan forskning og udvikling bør støttes af etiske grunde, med fokus på at give lige så god sundhedspleje for de ældre, som for de yngre.

Derfor er det den samfundsmæssige pligt, især for de professionelle indenfor biologi, medicin, sundhedspleje, økonomi og socio-politiske organisationer, kraftigt at anbefale større investeringer i forskning og udvikling, beskæftigende sig med forståelsen af de mekanismer der er forbundet med den menneskelige biologiske aldringsproces, og udvikle på baggrund af denne forskning, sikre, økonomisk overkommelige, og universelt tilgængelige anvendelige teknologier, mediciner og behandlinger.

Derfor opfordrer vi jer til at slå til lyd for hos folketingets politikere, eller i anden institutionel ramme, hvor i er aktive og kan gøre indflydelse, for oprettelse og gennemførelse af følgende politikker til fremmelse af forskning indenfor biologien bag aldring, og aldersrelaterede sygdomme, for at forbedre sundheden for den globale ældre befolkning:

1) Finansiering: At sikre en betydelig forøgelse af statslige og ikke-statslige midler til målrettet forskning i forebyggelse af de degenerative aldringsprocesser, og de dermed forbundne kroniske ikke-smitsomme sygdomme og handicaps, og for at sikre et sundt liv for alle.

2) Incitamenter: At udvikle og vedtage juridiske og lovgivningsmæssige rammer, der giver incitament rettet mod målrettet forskning og udvikling, designet til specifikt at omfatte udvikling, registrering, administration og adgang til lægemidler, medicinske teknologier og andre behandlingsformer, der vil lindre aldringsprocesser og associerede sygdomme og forlænge et sundt liv.

3) Institutioner: At etablere og udvide nationale og internationale koordinerings og konsultationsstrukturer, projekter og institutioner til at styre fremmelse af forskning, udvikling og uddannelse vdr. biologien bag aldring og associerede sygdomme, og udvikling af kliniske retningslinjer rettet mod at modvirke aldringsprocesser, og tilhørende aldringssygdomme, og til at udvide den sunde levetid for befolkningen.

Disse foranstaltninger er rettet mod at mindske byrden af den aldrende befolkning på samfundsøkonomien, og at lindre lidelserne for de ældre, og sorgen hos deres nærmeste.

På den positive side, hvis den gives tilstrækkelig støtte, kan disse foranstaltninger øge den sunde levetid for de ældre, udvide deres periode med samfundsdeltagelse, og forbedre deres følelse af livsnydelse, formål, ligeværd og værdisættelse af livet.

De Nordiske lande – byggende på deres dokumenterede resultater i stigende (sund) forventet levetid, deres enorme medicinske, videnskabelige, sociale, økonomiske og humanitære kapaciteter – kan spille en ledende rolle i at nå disse mål i regionen og globalt.

Vi opfordrer til at bruge anledning af den Nordiske kongres i Gerontologi, til at øge bevidstheden om problemet, og fremme målet om at opnå en sund langt liv for alle, gennem støtte til biomedicinsk alderdomsforskning.

Se også: “The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population” Aging and Disease, 6 (1), 2015

http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2014.1210

http://www.longevityforall.org/the-critical-need-to-promote-research-of-aging-around-the-world/

See also this letter in English: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-english/

And Finnish: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-finnish/

Prospective longevity R&D program in Kazakhstan

Potential establishment of a state program in Kazakhstan to improve the healthspan of the population

On May 19, 2016, the World Health Organization released its report “World Health Statistics: Monitoring Health for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”, describing the recent state of global health. The study reports rapid improvements in global life expectancy and healthy life expectancy. Though there are still considerable gaps and inequalities within and between countries. Can and should we do better?

Apparently there is one country, within the “developing” cohort, that seriously considers taking some action to improve its national health. On May 25-26, 2016, there took place the global economic and political forum at the capital of the Republic of Kazakhstan – The Astana Economic Forum 2016. The speech of Kazakhstan’s president – Nursultan Nazarbayev, is quite indicative of the country’s ambitions to narrow the international gaps. President Nazarbayev made a strong point about the fact that during the 25 years of the country’s existence, since its independence in 1991, the average life expectancy of the Kazakhstan people significantly increased, reaching 72 years (compared to about 64 in the early 1990s). This suggested the improving of health and longevity of the population as one of the main parameters of the country’s progress.

Going from directives to practice, it transpires that some concrete state-supported steps are now being discussed in Kazakhstan that would be explicitly dedicated to improving the country’s healthspan values, via strengthening national biomedical research, development and translation capabilities. A case study has been developed for a global healthspan extension program in Kazakhstan named “The Global Healthspan Extension Initiative”. The focus on healthspan extension is warranted by the increasing life expectancy and the corresponding increases in the incidence of aging-related diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease and neurodegenerative diseases, despite the current improvements in healthy life expectancy. Reducing these non-communicable diseases is a key priority for the SDG and WHO. As defined by Elya Duissemaliyeva, Managing Director of the Denobi Group and one of the key managers of this initiative, the aim of the program would be to “create a translation biotech hub (not just for basic research) in Kazakhstan with a primary focus on personalized and precision medicine.”

The Global Healthspan Extension Initiative under consideration in Kazakhstan aims to develop the country’s biomedical and biotechnological R&D and translational infrastructure by encouraging fast development and clinical translation of new life- and healthspan extension technologies through clinical trials, manufacturing, improved biospecimens and repositories, and IT infrastructure. It aims to establish new R&D centers and companies, building up collaborations of scientists and biotechnology entrepreneurs. It intends to accelerate R&D process and authorization of advanced new technologies thanks to expedited regulatory pathways and expert roadmaps for clinical trials and technologies approval. In short, the Global Healthspan Extension Initiative, if adopted, would set up the improvement of healthy lifespan, via advancement of biomedical technologies, as one of the explicit and central programs of the country’s development.

If indeed adopted and implemented, the impacts of the Global Healthspan Extension Initiative can be far reaching, not only for Kazakhstan, but globally. It may be safely stated that, if approved and implemented, the Global Healthspan Extension Initiative would be one of the first, or even the first state-level program specifically dedicated to improving the healthspan for the country’s population via development of biomedical technologies. Moreover, if adopted and implemented, this would be one of the first, or even the first state-level program explicitly aimed to implement the UN Sustainable Development Goal 3 “Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”. It may be highly informative to see how this experiment proceeds, to learn from its successes and failures. Just the fact of its planning and establishment may stimulate other countries to consider analogous or enhanced programs.

 

By Ilia Stambler, PhD

More on this initiative from Longevity for All http://www.longevityforall.org/prospective-longevity-rd-program-in-kazakhstan/

the National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan https://nla.nu.edu.kz/en/news/3857.html

And the Biogerontology Research Foundation, UK http://scienmag.com/kazakhstan-weighs-life-sciences-and-precision-medicine-as-a-new-economic-sector/

Developing countries – help yourselves! A case study of Kazakhstan

On May 19, 2016, the World Health Organization released its report “World Health Statistics: Monitoring Health for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)” describing the recent state of global health. The news is rather encouraging. The global life expectancy increased by 5 years, from about 66.5 to 71.4 presently, recording the fastest increase since the 1960s. The rightly so-called “developing” countries generally showed a much faster improvement compared to the complacently “developed” ones. Thus, Africa generally had the lowest life expectancy. The worst life expectancy was in Sub-Saharan Africa, just above 50 years of life expectation for the newborns in countries like Sierra Leone, Angola, Chad and Central African Republic. But at the same time Africa also had the fastest rate of increase, from about 50 years in 2000 to about 60 in 2015. Think about it: Every single year, about 8 months are added to the life expectancy in Africa, compared to about 4 months of yearly improvement globally. It gets better. Apparently, not only the general life expectancy is improving, but the healthy life expectancy, the number of years a newborn can expect to live in good health, is improving even faster. For 2015, the healthy life expectancy stood at 63.1 years globally, compared to about 56 reported for 2000 – over 7 years increase. In other words, the world has added almost half a year of healthy life expectancy for every passing year. Not only are people living longer, but they are also living healthier. This increase in fact demonstrates the possibility of a significant healthy lifespan (or “healthspan”) extension on a massive scale. Can and should we do better?

Still, the gaps in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy between the richer and poorer countries and between the richer and poorer segments in particular societies are quite appalling. About 30 years of expected life divide some countries of Sub-Saharan Africa, from the highest ranking countries with over 80 years of life expectancy, like Japan, Switzerland, Singapore, Australia, Spain, Italy, Iceland, Israel. The BRIC giants – Brazil, Russia, India and China – are struggling in the middle and upward, with the life-expectancies ranging around 68-76 years. Life expectancy is not a stand-alone parameter, but corresponds to and reflects other values of human development, such as education level and quality of life. Should the situation be improved? Apparently it should be. At least this is the directive of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), adopted back in September 2015, for which the present WHO health statistics report provides the data. Thus the Sustainable Development Goal – SDG 3 “Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages” asks the global community if they would please “Support the research and development of vaccines and medicines for the communicable and non-communicable diseases that primarily affect developing countries, provide access to affordable essential medicines and vaccines.” Do you know what your country and your government is doing or plans to do to accomplish those goals?

Apparently there is one country, within the “developing” cohort, that seriously considers taking some action to improve its national health. On May 25-26, 2016, there took place at the capital of the Republic of Kazakhstan a global gathering of economic and political elite – The Astana Economic Forum 2016. The speech of Kazakhstan’s president – Nursultan Nazarbayev, is quite indicative of the country’s ambitions to narrow the international gaps. President Nazarbayev emphasized the great disparities in the present levels of economic development and quality of life between countries. Thus, for example, as he pointed out, only 3.5% of the global education expenditures are dedicated to the poor countries of South-Eastern Asia and Africa, which are home to 45% of the children of the world. He estimated that about 50 billion dollars are required to finance universal basic education in poor countries, and suggested to finance it via restricting and/or taxing the offshore assets that currently amount to $30-40 trillion globally. To coordinate the efforts, he suggested creating a dedicated global “Foundation for the Development of Human Capital”. For Kazakhstan, such an improvement in education is not just a noble and commendable goal. It is vitally needed in order to shift the country from the current faltering “natural resources based economy” toward the “knowledge and innovation based economy”. Indeed president Nazarbayev strongly emphasized the necessity of this shift, the need for the “development of human capital”, strengthening the education and health systems, developing health and green technologies. He made a strong point about the fact that during the 25 years of the country’s existence, since its independence in 1991, the average life expectancy of the Kazakhstan people significantly increased, reaching 72 years (compared to about 64 in the early 1990s). This suggested the improving of health and longevity of the population as one of the main parameters of the country’s progress.

Going from directives to practice, it transpires that some concrete state-supported steps are now being discussed in Kazakhstan that would be explicitly dedicated to improving the country’s healthspan values, via strengthening national biomedical research, development and translation capabilities. A case study has been developed for a global healthspan extension program in Kazakhstan named “The Global Healthspan Extension Initiative”. The focus on healthspan extension is warranted by the increasing life expectancy and the corresponding increases in the incidence of aging-related diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease and neurodegenerative diseases, despite the demonstrated improvements in healthy life expectancy. Reducing these non-communicable diseases is a key priority for the SDG and WHO. As defined by Elya Duissemaliyeva, Managing Director of the Denobi Group and one of the key managers of this initiative, the aim of the program would be to “create a translation biotech hub (not just for basic research) in Kazakhstan with a primary focus on personalized and precision medicine.” “We intend to build a translation engine to drive massive biomedical innovation into the country,” she emphasized. The underlying idea is that it may be difficult for Kazakhstan to quickly reach the advanced R&D capabilities of the current leaders in the field by following in their footsteps. But it may be easier to “leapfrog” them – to create the favorable regulatory environment and incentives to rapidly draw in and help realize the most advanced R&D ideas that are currently struggling against various “brick walls” and “glass ceilings” in theirs countries of origin. “We will perform the meta-analysis and selection of advanced and emerging technologies in the field of healthspan extension, considering their potential efficacy and safety, with the aim to solve social and economic issues” — adds Professor Zhaxybay Zhumadilov, General Director of the National Laboratory Astana, at Nazarbayev University – one of the main prospective performance sites for the program. The architects of this initiative envision an end to the entrenched dichotomy between the “developing” vs. “developed” countries, but anticipated a new distinction between “innovative” and “less-innovative” countries.

Some of the negotiations on the program were conducted in mid-April at the invitation-only forum at the University of Oxford and in Astana in mid-May at the Nazarbayev University, coinciding with the 4th International Conference on Regenerative Medicine and Healthy Aging. The Global Healthspan Extension Initiative  under consideration in Kazakhstan aims to develop the country’s biomedical and biotechnological R&D and translational infrastructure by encouraging fast development and clinical translation of new life- and healthspan extension technologies through clinical trials, manufacturing, improved biospecimens and repositories, and IT infrastructure. It aims to establish new R&D centers and companies, building up collaborations of scientists and biotechnology entrepreneurs. It intends to accelerate R&D process and authorization of advanced new technologies thanks to expedited regulatory pathways and expert roadmaps for clinical trials and technologies approval. In short, the Global Healthspan Extension Initiative, if adopted, would set up the improvement of healthy lifespan, via advancement of biomedical technologies, as one of the explicit and central programs of the country’s development.

If indeed adopted and implemented, the impacts of the Global Healthspan Extension Initiative can be far reaching, not only for Kazakhstan, but globally. For Kazakhstan it could help ease the entrenched dependence on natural resources, generally modernize the economy, improve the country’s healthcare system and productivity. Globally, beyond regular professional cooperation that must be involved in setting up such a program, it may also serve as a model to consider, adapt or refine for other national contexts. It may be safely stated that, if approved and implemented, the Global Healthspan Extension Initiative would be one of the first, or even the first state-level program specifically dedicated to improving the healthspan for the country’s population via development of biomedical technologies. Moreover, if adopted and implemented, this would be one of the first, or even the first state-level program explicitly aimed to implement the UN Sustainable Development Goal 3 “Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages”. It may be highly informative to see how this experiment proceeds, to learn from its successes and failures. Just the fact of its planning and establishment may stimulate other countries to consider analogous or enhanced programs. As one of the main players in Central Asia, generating 60% of the region’s GDP, one of the active members of the Eurasian Shanghai Cooperation Organization, with the territory comparable to Western Europe, the place where practical space exploration started — the capacity and impact of Kazakhstan can yet be widely felt.

 

By Ilia Stambler

 

About the author: Ilia Stambler, PhD, is the founder and chair of the Israeli Longevity Alliance (ISRLA, www.longevityisrael.org). He obtained his Ph.D. degree from Bar Ilan University, Israel, from the department of Science, Technology and Society. He has been strongly involved in education and advocacy for biomedical aging research, in Israel and Internationally. He is an affiliate scholar with the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, executive committee member and outreach coordinator of the International Society on Aging and Disease, and coordinator for the Longevity For All advocacy network.  He is the author of A History of Life-extensionism in the Twentieth Century (http://www.longevityhistory.com/) and numerous academic papers on aging and longevity science, history and advocacy.

 

Казахстан – из «развивающейся» страны в лидеры инновации?

19 мая 2016 года, Всемирная Организация Здравоохранения опубликовала отчет под названием “Всемирная статистика здравоохранения: мониторинг состояния здоровья в целях устойчивого развития (ЦУР)”. С 2000 до 2015 год, продолжительность жизни в мире увеличилась в среднем на 5 лет, примерно от 66,5 до 71,4. Это самый быстрый темп роста, наблюдающийся с 1960-х годов. Не только общая продолжительность жизни улучшается, но и ожидаемая продолжительность здоровой жизни, т.е. число лет, которое новорожденный может рассчитывать прожить в добром здравии, растет еще быстрее, с 56 до 63,1 лет. Другими словами, каждый год в мире прибавляется пол года здоровой продолжительности жизни. Люди не только живут дольше, но и живут дольше здоровыми. Этот прирост наглядно демонстрирует возможность увеличения здоровой продолжительности жизни или «здорового долголетия» в массовом масштабе.

Нужно ли стремиться к дальнейшим улучшениям? Видимо, нужно. По крайней мере, это предписывает одна из директив Целей Устойчивого Развития ООН, принятых в сентябре 2015 года, для которых данный отчет ВОЗ предоставляет статистику. А именно – Цель 3 «Обеспечение здорового образа жизни и содействие благополучию для всех в любом возрасте» настоятельно призывает мировое сообщество «Оказывать содействие исследованиям и разработкам вакцин и лекарственных препаратов для лечения инфекционных и неинфекционных болезней, которые в первую очередь затрагивают развивающиеся страны, обеспечивать доступность недорогих основных лекарственных средств и вакцин». Знаете ли вы, что делает или планирует ваша страна и ваше правительство для достижения этих целей?

В одной из стран об этом задумываются всерьез. Это было отчетливо видно на прошедшем 25-26 мая в столице Казахстана – IX Астанинском экономическом форуме. В своем пленарном выступлении, Президент Нурсултан Назарбаев подчеркнул колоссальные неравенства в современных уровнях экономического развития и качества жизни между странами. Эти неравенства можно преодолеть только путем развития и сохранения «человеческого капитала» — всеобщего улучшения уровня образования и здоровья. С целью координации международных усилий в этом направлении, он предложил создать специальный глобальный “Фонд развития человеческого капитала”. Как подчеркнул президент, «никакое государство не сможет развиваться без грамотных, образованных, здоровых и предприимчивых людей». Для Казахстана – это жизненно необходимо, чтобы перейти от “экономики ресурсов” к “экономике знаний и инноваций”. Значительное увеличение средней продолжительности жизни Казахстанцев (с 64-х до 73-х лет с момента обретения независимости в 1991 году) отмечалось как один из основных показателей прогресса страны. Другие участники форума разделяли оптимистичное видение. Как заявил известный китайский предприниматель, основатель концерна «Алибаба» Джэк Ма, «Мы будем жить дольше, решим проблему рака».

В настоящее время в Казахстане обсуждаются конкретные государственные меры, направленные ​​на увеличение здоровой продолжительности жизни в стране, путем укрепления национальной инфраструктуры биомедицинских исследований и разработок и их внедрения в клиническую практику. Проводится базисное исследование для глобальной программы продления здоровой жизни в Казахстане под названием “Глобальная инициатива медицины продления здоровой жизни”. Задача эта становится все более насущной, ввиду общего увеличения продолжительности жизни и соответствующего увеличения частоты возрастно-зависимых заболеваний, таких как рак, диабет, сердечно-сосудистые и нейродегенеративные заболевания, несмотря на текущие улучшения ожидаемой продолжительности здоровой жизни. Сокращение этих неинфекционных заболеваний является ключевым приоритетом программ ВОЗ и Целей Устойчивого Развития ООН.

Как отметила Эля Дуйсемалиева, управляющий директор группы Деноби, и одна из ключевых фигур этой инициативы, цель программы будет заключаться в “создании в Казахстане центра притяжения для практического внедрения биотехнологических разработок (не только и не столько фундаментальных исследований) в основном в сфере персонализированной и прецизионной медицины”. “Мы намерены создать механизм трансляционного внедрения, для привлечения и стимулирования массовых биомедицинских инноваций в стране” — подчеркнула она. Основная идея состоит в том, что для Казахстана может быть трудно достичь научных и технологических возможностей современных лидеров в этих областях, просто следуя по их стопам. Но этого можно будет достигнуть путем создания благоприятной регуляторной среды и стимулов для ускоренного привлечения и помощи в реализации наиболее передовых научно-практических идей. В настоящее время, во многих странах, многие важные медицинские разработки душатся бюрократическим прессом, с трудном пробивают себе дорогу через различные «непробиваемые стены» и «стеклянные потолки». При благоприятном климате, они смогли быть расцвести в Казахстане. “Мы проведем анализ и отбор передовых технологий в области продления здорового долголетия с учетом эффективности и безопасности,  для решения социальных и экономических вопросов» — добавляет профессор Жаксыбай Жумадилов, Генеральный директор Национальной Лаборатории Астана, Назарбаев Университета – одного из основных планируемых мест выполнения программы.

Детали программы обсуждались в середине апреля на эксклюзивном форуме в Оксфордском университете и в Астане в середине мая в Назарбаев Университете, во время 4-ой Международной конференции по регенеративной медицине и здоровому долголетию. “Глобальная инициатива медицины продления здоровой жизни”, рассматриваемая в Казахстане, призвана «облегчить жизнь» ученых, разработчиков, предпринимателей, для развития в стране инфраструктуры для биомедицинских и биотехнологических исследований и разработок и их быстрой трансляции в клиническую практику. Планируется стимулировать клинические испытания, промышленное производство лекарственных средств, создавать и совершенствовать новые биологические ресурсы и хранилища, информационно-технологические инфраструктуры и базы данных, инициировать новые центры кооперации. В целом, “Глобальная инициатива медицины продления здоровой жизни”, в случае ее утверждения, поставит цель улучшения здоровья и активного долголетия благодаря развитию новых биомедицинских технологий, как одну из центральных программных целей развития страны.

В случае, если эта программа будет принята и реализована, это может иметь далеко идущие последствия, не только в Казахстане, но и в мире. В Казахстане это может помочь преодолеть зависимость от природных ресурсов, в целом модернизировать экономику, улучшить систему здравоохранения. На международном уровне, она может стимулировать сотрудничество и создание подобных программ по продлению здоровой жизни во многих других странах, в первую очередь в так называемых «развивающихся странах». При успешном развитии, эта инициатива может помочь положить конец разделению стран на «развивающиеся» и «развитые», а станет примером нового разделения на «инновационные» и «не инновационные» страны.

 

Др. Илья Стамблер

 

Об авторе: Др. Илья Стамблер является основателем и председателем Израильской Ассоциации за Продление Жизни (ISRLA, http://longevityisrael.org/). Он получил степень доктора философии в университете Бар-Илан, в Израиле, на кафедре науки, технологии и общества. Он активно участвует в образовательной и просветительской деятельности в поддержку медико-биологических исследований старения, в Израиле и на международном уровне. Он является аффилиированным исследователем в Институте Этики и Новых Технологий (IEET http://www.ieet.org/), членом исполнительного комитета и координатором по общественным связям Международного общества по изучению старения и болезней (ISOAD, http://isoad.org/), а также координатором активистской сети – «Долголетие для Всех» (http://www.longevityforall.org/). Он автор книги «История Идей о Продлении Жизни в Двадцатом Веке» (http://www.longevityhistory.com/) и многочисленных академических работ по различным научным, историческим и социальным аспектам старения и долголетия.

 

 

 

Kriittinen tarve edistää ikääntymistutkimusta, ikääntymiseen liittyvien sairauksien parantamista sekä lisätä terveyttä ja elinikää vanhuksille pohjoismaissa sekä maailmanlaajuisesti.

The English version: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-english/

The Swedish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/det-akuta-behovet-av-att-framja-forskning-om-aldrande/

The Danish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/det-kritiske-behov-for-at-fremme-forskning-omkring-aeldning/

The Finnish version (by Antti Peltonen):

Kriittinen tarve edistää ikääntymistutkimusta, ikääntymiseen liittyvien sairauksien parantamista sekä lisätä terveyttä ja elinikää vanhuksille pohjoismaissa sekä maailmanlaajuisesti

Viimeisen vuosikymmenen aikana, keskimääräinen elinikä on maailmanlaajuisesti noussut, ja oli vuonna 2014 noin 70 vuotta (6 vuotta enemmän kuin vuonna 1990) ja noin 80 ikävuotta kehittyneissä maissa . Kehitys on ollut hurjaa, 1900-luvun alkupuolella keskimääräinen elinikä kehitysmaissa oli 50 vuotta, ja suomessakin 50-55 vuotta vielä 1940-luvulla. Pohjoismaissa – Suomi, Ruotsi, Norja, Tanska ja Islanti – elinajanodote on korkein maailmassa, ja on selvästi yli 80 vuotta. Siitä huolimatta, että elinajanodote yleisellä tasolla heijastelee kehitystä, uusia haasteita kuitenkin nousee esiin kaiken aikaa. Nämä uudet ongelmat kumpuavat siitä tosiasiasta, että vanhentuessaan ihminen alkaa kärsiä enenevissä määrin biologisista ja kognitiivisista rappeumista, siitä huolimatta, että näiden ongelmien vakavuus ja kehittymisen nopeudet vaihtelevat yksilöittäin. Rappeuttavat ikääntymisprosessit ovat suurin pinnan alla oleva ei-tarttuvien tautien, kuten syövän, sydänsairauksien, aivohalvausten, tyypin 2 diabetes, Alzheimerin taudin, sekä keuhkosairauksien aiheuttaja. Ikääntyminen lisää kuolemisen riskiä tartuntataudeissa, kuten keuhkokuumeessa ja influenssassa. Alttius vahinkoihin ja traumoihin (kuten kaatumiset ja aivotärähdykset) ihmisen vanhetessa johtuu vanhuuden heikentyneestä tasapainosta ja mielentilasta, sekä myös riski joutua fyysisen väkivallan kohteeksi lisääntyvät merkittävästi iän myötä. Ikääntyminen lisää ja pahentaa epäterveellisistä elintavoista, kuten tupakoinnista, huonosta ruokavaliosta, liikkumattomuudesta ja alkoholin käytöstä aiheutuvia terveyshaittoja. Yhteenvetona voidaan todeta, että ikääntyminen, siihen liittyvine terveyshaittoineen, on tärkein kuolleisuuteen ja sairastavuuteen liittyvä syy maailmanlaajuisesti, ja siihen pitäisi myös suhtautua ongelman vakavuuteen suhteutetulla tavalla. Näiden vakavien ja negatiivisten vaikutusten takia ikääntymistä pidetään jo nyt yhtenä suurimmista taloudellisista ja sosiaalisista haasteista, jotka useimmat maat – erityisesti teollistuneet maat – joutuvat kohtaamaan tulevina vuosikymmeninä.

Ikääntyvän yhteiskunnan haaste on jo pitkään tunnustettu ja lukuisia tutkimus- ja kehityshankkeita maailmanlaajuisesti on aloitettu ikääntymisen negatiivisten vaikutusten hidastamiseksi tai välttämiseksi. Kuitenkin moni lääketieteellinen tutkimus- ja kehitystyö keskittyy pääsääntöisesti yksittäisten tautien, kuten Alzheimerista johtuvan dementian, sydän- ja verisuonitautien, osteoporoosin, diabeteksen, syövän jne. torjuntaan. Kuitenkin alla piilevä, hajottava ikääntymisprosessi, joka on ratkaisevassa asemassa näiden tautien syntyyn, on usein alipainotettu. Uusi, kokonaisvaltaisempi tutkimussuunta, tai ajattelutapa, ottaa jalansijaa ikääntymistutkimuksessa ja vaikuttavampien lääkkeiden kehitystyössä, jossa keskitytään muutamaan tärkeimpään, mutta toisiinsa liittyviin, ikääntymisen perussyistä kerralla. Tällaiset lähestymistavat ovat erittäin lupaavia seuraavista syistä:

– Niitä tukee jo nyt tieteellinen näyttö, joka sisältää tieteellistä todistusaineistoa eliniän pidentämisestä eläinmalleilla ja uusimmista teknologisista innovaatioista, joilla voidaan puuttua suoraan itse ikääntymisen mekanismeihin. Kaikkea tätä tukeva tutkimus vaikuttaa kumulatiivisesti ja siten nopeuttaa muutosta ikääntymisen perustutkimuksesta laajasti saatavilla oleviksi terapioiksi.

– Näistä on apua myös moniin ei-tarttuviin ikääntymiseen liittyviin tauteihin, kunhan kyseiset taudit ovat vahvasti sidoksissa ikääntymisen rappeuttaviin prosesseihin (kuten krooniset tulehdukset, makromolekyylien sakkautuminen, somaattiset mutaatiot ja kantasolujen väheneminen). Lisäksi parantuneen immuniteetin ansiosta, näillä on mahdollisuus vähentää vanhusten alttiutta saada jokin tarttuva tauti.

– Innovatiivisesti käytettynä nämä johtavat kestäviin ratkaisuihin monissa ikääntymiseen liittyvissä lääketieteellisissä ja sosiaalisissa haasteissa, jotka ovat mahdollisesti globaalisti sovellettavissa. Tärkeimpänä on mittavat säästöt ikääntyneiden terveydenhuoltokuluissa, sekä pitämällä ikäihmiset pidempään tuotteliaina ja vähemmän taakkana yhteiskunnassa. Tämänkaltaiset näkymät tekevät yleisestä ja biolääketieteen tutkimuksesta potentiaalisesti tuottavinta mahdollista tutkimusta.

– Tätä tutkimusta ja kehitystä pitäisi tukea eettisistä syistä, jotta kaiken ikäisille olisi tarjolla tasa-arvoista terveydenhuoltoa ikään katsomatta.

Näistä syistä, erityisesti biologian asiantuntijoilla, terveydenhuoltohenkilöstöllä, sekä talous- että poliittisilla järjestöillä on velvollisuus suositella suurempia investointeja ikääntymisen biologian selvittämiseen, ja kääntämään tästä saadut tulokset turvalliseen, kannattavaan ja yleisesti saatavilla oleviksi teknologioiksi ja hoidoiksi.

Näin ollen, kehotamme teitä viemään eteenpäin maan hallituksen, tai oman alanne verkostojenne kautta joissa vaikutatte, alla lueteltuja toimenpiteitä, toimenpiteitä joilla edistetään ja laitetaan toteen ikääntymisen biologian selvittämistä, ikääntymistutkimusta, jotta ikääntyneiden terveyden tilaa saadaan parannettua:

1) Rahoitus: Toimia lisäämään merkittävästi yksityistä ja valtion rahoitusta tavoitehakuiseen tutkimukseen, joka tähtää rappeuttavien ikääntymisprosessien kehittymisen estämiseen, ikääntymiseen liittyvien kroonisten ei-tarttuvien tautien ja kyvyttömyyden ehkäisyyn, sekä lisäämään tervettä ja tuotteliasta aikaa koko elinkaaren ajaksi.

2) Kannustimia: Toimia kehittämään ja omaksumaan lakeja ja säätelyä, jotka kannustavat tavoitehakuiseen tutkimukseen ja kehittämiseen, ja jotka on erityisesti suunnattu ikääntymisprosessien selvittämiseen, ikäihmisten sairauksien vähentämiseen ja terveellisen elämän edistämiseen.

3) Instituutiot: Toimia perustamaan, edistämään ja laajentamaan kansallista ja kansainvälistä koordinaatiota, konsultaatiorakenteita, ohjelmia ja instituutioita ohjaamaan tutkimusta, kehittämistä ja koulutusta. Nämä toimet tulisi kohdentaa ikääntymisen biologian selvittämiseen ja ikääntymiseen liittyvien sairauksien hoitamiseen ja kliinisten ohjeiden kehittämiseen, joilla moduloidaan ikääntymisprosessia ja lisätään tervettä ja tuotteliasta elinikää koko väestölle.

Nämä toimet on suunniteltu vähentämään ikääntymisprosessien luomaa taakkaa taloudelle, sekä lievittämään ikääntyvien kärsimystä ja omaisten surua. Positiivinen uutinen on se, että mikäli tukea myönnetään riittävästi, näillä toimilla saadaan lisättyä ikäihmisten tervettä elinajanodotetta, lisättyä ikäihmisten tuottavuutta ja kanssa käymistä yhteiskunnassa, vahvistettua heidän elämän arvostusta, sekä vahvistettua heidän ilon, merkityksen ja tasa-arvon tunnetta

Pohjoismaissa on todistettavasti korkeat elinajanodotteet, terveimmät vanhukset, mahtavat lääketieteelliset, sosioekonomiset ja humanitaariset resurssit, joten on luontevaa että juuri täällä voitaisiin myös näyttää tietä muulle maailmalle, kuinka yllä luetellut tavoitteet olisi mahdollista saavuttaa niin alueellisesti, kuin myös maailmanlaajuisesti.

Me painotammekin siis teitä käyttämään tilaisuutta  pohjoismaisessa gerontologian kongressissa hyväksi, ja nostamaan tietoisuutta näissä asioissa ja edistämään tavoitetta saada terveempi ikääntyminen kaikkien saataville, tukemalla ikääntymisen biolääketieteellistä tiedettä.

Katso myös: The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population” Aging and Disease, 6 (1), 2015

http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2014.1210

http://www.longevityforall.org/the-critical-need-to-promote-research-of-aging-around-the-world/

 

The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population in Nordic Countries and Globally

Flag_of_FinlandFlag_of_Sweden.svg2000px-Flag_of_Norway.svgFlag_of_Denmark.svg2500px-Flag_of_Iceland.svg

This is an outreach letter that was launched toward the 23rd Nordic Congress of Gerontology that took place in Tampere, Finland, on June 19-22, 2016. This was an excellent opportunity to raise awareness about the need to promote longevity research in Nordic countries. Suggestions are welcome for planning further outreach and helping to spread the word.

The Finnish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/nordic-longevity-outreach-finnish/

The Danish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/det-kritiske-behov-for-at-fremme-forskning-omkring-aeldning/

The Swedish version: http://www.longevityforall.org/det-akuta-behovet-av-att-framja-forskning-om-aldrande/

The English version:

The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population in Nordic Countries and Globally

On behalf of the International Society on Aging and Disease, the Longevity Finland association and other allied longevity research advocacy organizations, we would like to address you toward the 23rd Nordic Congress in Gerontology (Tampere, Finland, June 19-22, 2016, http://23nkg.fi/), and bring the following open letter to your attention.

Over the past decades, the average life expectancy has increased globally, reaching a worldwide average of about 70 years in 2014 (6 years longer than in 1990) and around 80 in the developed countries (compared to about 50 years in the developed countries in the early 20th century).  In the Nordic countries – Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland – the life expectancy is of the highest in the world, well over 80. Although the increasing life expectancy generally reflects positive human development, new challenges are arising. They stem from the fact that growing older is still inherently associated with biological and cognitive degeneration, although the severity and speed of cognitive decline, physical frailty and psychological impairment can vary between individuals.  Degenerative aging processes are the major underlying cause for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cancer, ischemic heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, obstructive lung disease, and others. Aging also increases the risk of morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases like pneumonia and influenza. Moreover, the susceptibility to injury and trauma (such as falls and concussions), due to the impairment of balance and mental state, and even falling victim to violence, are strongly increased by the aging process. Also, the processes of aging exacerbate and reinforce the effects of other risk factors of non-communicable diseases (tobacco use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and harmful use of alcohol). In sum, aging-related health decline is the main cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide and should be addressed according to the severity of the problem. Because of these severe and negative effects, aging is already regarded as one of the greatest economic and societal challenges that most countries – especially in the industrialized world – will face in the coming decades.

The challenge of the aging society has been widely recognized and numerous research and development programs around the globe have been initiated to tackle age-related diseases. Yet, medical research and development efforts currently are focused mainly on single diseases, like Alzheimer’s dementia, heart disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, cancer, etc. The underlying degenerative aging processes, determinative for the emergence of those diseases, are often underemphasized. New directions in research and development take a more holistic approach for tackling the degenerative processes and negative biological effects of human aging, addressing several major fundamental causes of aging and aging-related diseases at once and in an interrelated manner.  Such approaches are very promising, for the following reasons:

  • They are already supported by scientific proofs of concept, involving the evidential increase in healthy lifespan in animal models and the emerging technological capabilities to intervene into fundamental aging processes. Any reinforcement in this research can produce cumulative effects and speed up the translation from basic studies to widely available therapies.
  • They can provide solutions to a number of non-communicable, age-related diseases, insofar as such diseases are strongly determined by degenerative aging processes (such as chronic inflammation, cross-linkage of macromolecules, somatic mutations, loss of stem cell populations, and others). Moreover, they are likely to decrease susceptibility of the elderly also to communicable diseases due to improvements in immunity.
  • The innovative, applied results of such research and development will lead to sustainable solutions for a large array of age-related medical and social challenges, that may be globally applicable. The most important of them are the savings in healthcare costs for aging-related diseases and increase in the period of productivity of older persons. These prospective effects make this research potentially the most profitable form of general and biomedical research.
  • Such research and development should be supported on ethical grounds, to provide equal health care chances for the elderly as for the young.

Therefore it is the societal duty, especially of the professionals in biology, medicine, health care, economy and socio-political organizations to strongly recommend greater investments in research and development dealing with the understanding of mechanisms associated with the human biological aging process and translating these insights into safe, affordable and universally available applied technologies and treatments.

Hence we urge you to advocate with the government, or in any institutional framework where you are active and influential, for the creation and implementation of the following policies to promote research into the biology of aging and aging-related diseases, for improving the health of the global elderly population:

1)               Funding: Act to ensure a significant increase of governmental and non-governmental funding for goal-directed (translational) research in preventing the degenerative aging processes, and the associated chronic non-communicable diseases and disabilities, and for extending healthy and productive life, during the entire life course.

2)               Incentives: Act to develop and adopt legal and regulatory frameworks that give incentives for goal-directed research and development designed to specifically address the development, registration, administration and accessibility of drugs, medical technologies and other therapies that will ameliorate the aging processes and associated diseases and extend healthy life.

3)               Institutions: Act to establish and expand national and international coordination and consultation structures, programs and institutions to steer promotion of research, development and education on the biology of aging and associated diseases and the development of clinical guidelines to modulate the aging processes and associated aging-related diseases and to extend the healthy and productive lifespan for the population.

These measures are designed to reduce the burden of the aging process on the economy and to alleviate the suffering of the aged and the grief of their loved ones. On the positive side, if granted sufficient support, these measures can increase the healthy life expectancy for the elderly, extend their period of productivity and their interaction with society, and enhance their sense of enjoyment, purpose, equality and valuation of life.

Nordic countries – building on their proven achievements in increasing healthy life expectancy, their tremendous medical, scientific, social, economic and humanitarian capabilities – can play a leading part in achieving these goals in the region and globally. We urge to use the occasion of the  23rd Nordic Congress in Gerontology to raise the awareness of the issue and advance the goal of achieving healthy longevity for all through the support of biomedical science of aging.

See also: “The Critical Need to Promote Research of Aging and Aging-related Diseases to Improve Health and Longevity of the Elderly Population” Aging and Disease, 6 (1), 2015

http://www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2014.1210

http://www.longevityforall.org/the-critical-need-to-promote-research-of-aging-around-the-world/

 

Frequently asked questions about life extension

The most frequently asked questions about life extension (or extended longevity, lifespan or healthspan extension) concern the possibilities of its accomplishment, potential changes in individual and social identity and meaning, ethical values, and the availability of resources due to expected life extension, as well as questions about some possible actions that should be undertaken to accomplish life extension. In the presentation below, you may find some materials that may help address some of these questions:

The Tasks of Longevity Promotion: Science, Ethics and Public Policy – Potential presentation topics on longevity research

Ilia Stambler, PhD

Originally published at: http://www.longevityhistory.com/all-articles/

The task of healthy life extension, or healthy longevity extension, dictates a broad variety of questions and tasks, relating to science and technology, individual and communal ethics, and finally public policy, especially health and research policy. Despite the wide variety, the related questions may be classified into 3 groups. The first group of questions concerns the feasibility of the accomplishment of life extension. Is it theoretically and technologically possible? What are our grounds for optimism? What are the means to ensure that the life extension will be healthy life extension? The second group concerns the desirability of the accomplishment of life extension for the individual and the society, provided it will become some day possible through scientific intervention. How will then life extension affect the perception of personhood? How will it affect the availability of resources for the population? Yet, the third and final group can be termed normative. What actions should we take? Assuming that life extension is scientifically possible and socially desirable, and that its implications are either demonstrably positive or, in case of a negative forecast, they are amenable – what practical implications should these determinations have for public policy, in particular health policy and research policy, in a democratic society? Should we pursue the goal of life extension? If yes, then how? How can we make it an individual and social priority? Given the rapid population aging and the increasing incidence and burden of age-related diseases, on the pessimistic side, and the rapid development of medical technologies, on the optimistic side, these become vital questions of social responsibility.

Download Presentation

LONGEVITY PROMOTION

Aging research meetings calendar

Aging research meetings calendar

Gathered by John D. Furber

Disease Drivers of Aging: 
2016 Advances in  Geroscience Summit
April 13-14, 2016, New York City
Co-sponsored by AFAR, GSA, NIH, NYAS
Cognitive Aging Conference
April 14-17, 2016, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
31st International Conference
Alzheimer’s Disease International
April 21-24, 2016, Budapest, Hungary
Biomedical Innovation for Healthy Longevity
April 25-28, 2016, St. Petersburg, Russia
Australian Biology of Ageing Conference
April 29, 2016, Coogee NSW, Australia
Registration is FREE, including snacks and lunch.
Keystone Symposium:  
Epigenetic and Metabolic Regulation of Aging and Aging-Related Diseases
May 1—5, 2016, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
Oxygen Club of California World Congress
Redox Medicine and Nutrition
May 4-6, 2016, University of California at Davis
Abstract deadline extended to April 12. (Proceed although web site says March 31 😉
MITOCHONDRIAL MEDICINE: 
DEVELOPING NEW TREATMENTS FOR MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE
May 4-6, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
Closed: Past registration deadline
Conference on Translational Research in Healthy Ageing
Healthy Ageing Research Centre (HARC)
May 11-13, 2016, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
2016 NHLBI/NIDDK Mitochondrial Biology Symposium: 
Novel Roles of Mitochondria in Health and Disease
May 19-20, 2016, Natcher Conference Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Registration is FREE. Register by May 6.
Abstract deadline: April 8, 2016
Bay Area Aging Meeting
May 26, 2016, University of California, Berkeley
3rd World Congress on Glycation & Maillard Reaction
International Society of Antioxidants in Nutrition and Health (ISANH)
May 2627, 2016, Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
This congress talk about all the fields related to glycation: pathologies & diseases, mitochondria, microbiota, food, RAGE, i-RAGE, etc.
Early registration deadline: March 17, 2016
Oral abstracts deadline: April 11.
Poster abstracts deadline:  May 8.
American Aging Association 45th Annual Meeting
“Targeting Aging: the Ultimate Preventative Medicine”
June 3-5, 2016, Seattle, Washington
held in conjunction with the
Nathan Shock Center Summit on Personalized Geroscience
June 1 – 2, 2016. Note: Registration fee to the Nathan Shock Summit will be waived for those registering for the American Aging Association meeting.
President and Meeting Chair: Matt Kaeberlein
Abstracts due April 15, 2016
Alzheimer’s Disease Congress
June 7-9, 2016, London, England, UK, EU
The Asian Conference on Aging & Gerontology 2016
AGEN2016
June 9 – 12, 2016, Art Center of Kobe, Kobe, Japan
Abstract Submission Deadline: April 15, 2016
Mitochondria: balancing health and disease
June 14, 2016, University College London
Registration deadline:  June 2, 2016
FREE, but registration is required.
Harvard/Paul F. Glenn Symposium on Aging
June 17, 2016, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Please register Free online at:
You can download the upcoming program, as well as past programs and photos here:
23rd Nordic Congress of Gerontology
‘Good ageing – better society’
June 19-22, 2016, Tampere, Finland
Comparative and Experimental Approaches to Aging Biology Research
Training Course
MDI Biological Laboratory
June 19 – July 3, 2016, Mount Desert Island, Maine, USA
This is a 2-week intensive research training course using comparative models and approaches to explore biological aging. Models include C. elegans, Drosophila, mice, and African turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri).
Cellular Senescence: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities
July 3-6, 2016, Israel
Cell Symposium:  Aging and Metabolism
July 10-12, 2016, Melia Sitges, Spain
Thirteenth International Symposium on Neurobiology and Neuroendocrinology of Aging
July 17-22, 2016, Gasthof Hotel Lamm, Bregenz, Austria
Organizer: Holly M. Brown-Borg, Ph.D., Univ of North Dakota
Early discounted registration before March 1, 2016
Aging, Metabolism, Stress, Pathogenesis, and Small RNAs in C.elegans
July 21-24, 2016, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Abstract deadline: May 9
Alzheimer’s Association International Conference AAIC 16
July 22-28 2016, Toronto, Canada
RAAD Festival
The Coalition for Radical Life Extension
August 4-7, 2016, San Diego, California
Gordon Research Conference on Thiol-Based Redox Regulation & Signaling
“Thiols in Biology and Medicine: Innovations Driving Disease Prevention, Therapeutics and Quality of Life”
August 7-12, 2016, Stowe, Vermont, USA
     ( Note: An affiliated Gordon Research Seminar for graduate students and postdocs will take place on the preceding two days.  Separate registration is required.
“Redox Biology in Diseases of Aging: Fundamental Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential”
EMBO Workshop: Molecular mechanisms of ageing and regeneration – 
From pluripotency to senescence
August 16-24, 2016, Spetses, Greece
Registration deadline:  May 1, 2016
Abstract deadline:  June 15, 2016
EMBO Workshop:  Organelle Contact Sites:
Intracellular Communication and Role in Disease
September 15-18, 2016, Domus de Maria, Italy
Registration deadline:  July 15, 2016
Abstract deadline:  June 15, 2016
Basel Life Sciences Week – BLSW – MipTec 2016
September 19-23, 2016, Basel, Switzerland
Aging and Drug Discovery Forum
September 21-22, 2016
Deadline for abstract submission is 21 April 2016
4th World Parkinson Congress
September 20-23, 2016, Portland, Oregon
Abstracts due 25 April 2016
Early registration discount before July 5, 2016
Future of Ageing
10th European Congress of Biogerontology
6th Biogerontological Meeting at the Nencki Institute
September 23-24, 2016, Warsaw, Poland
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory meeting on 
Mechanisms of Aging
September 26 – 30, 2016, New York
Abstract Deadline: July 25, 2016
Organizers:  Vera Gorbunova, Malene Hansen, Scott Pletcher
International Conference on Aging and Disease (ICAD)
International Society on Aging and Disease (ISOAD)
September 30 – October 2, 2016, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
    Proposal Submission Deadline: May 1, 2016
    Abstract Submission Deadline: September 1, 2016
Eurosymposium on Healthy Ageing (EHA)
September 29 – October 1, 2016, Brussels, Belgium
Canadian Association on Gerontology
45th Annual Scientific & Educational Meeting
October 20-22, 2016, Montreal, Quebec
Gerontological Society of America (GSA)
69th Annual Scientific Meeting
“New Lens on Aging: Changing Attitudes, Expanding Possibilities”
November 16-20, 2016, New Orleans, Louisiana
Abstracts deadline: March 15, 2016
Society for Redox Biology and Medicine: 23rd Annual Meeting.
Society for Free Radical Research International 18th Biennial Congress.
(SFRBM and SFFRI joint meeting)
November 16 – 19, 2016, San Francisco, California
21st IAGG World Congress of Gerontology and Geriatrics
“Global Aging and Health: Bridging Science, Policy, and Practice.”
with GSA
July 23 – 27, 2017, San Francisco, California
GSA is the largest membership organization of IAGG and will serve as the host society for the IAGG World Congress. GSA will not convene its own Annual Scientific Meeting that year. IAGG convenes every four years.
IAGG Abstracts deadline: July 15, 2016
Gerontological Society of America (GSA)
Annual Scientific Meeting
“Aging as a Lifelong Process”
November 1418, 2018, Boston, Massachusetts
####### END OF AGING RESEARCH MEETINGS LIST #######
Compiled by John Furber.
Several other lists on related topics are at the following websites:
Society for Free Radical Research International: http://www.sfrr.org
FASEB Scientific Meetings: http://faseb.org/Home.aspx
FASEB Science Research Conferences: http://faseb.org/Science-Research-Conferences.aspx
Gordon Research Conferences: http://www.grc.org
Alzheimer’s Research Forum:  http://www.alzforum.org/res/res/conf/default.asp
UCL Consortium for Mitochondrial Research:  http://www.ucl.ac.uk/mitochondria/meetings
A variety of biology-related conferences are listed at F1000Research: 
See some of the excellent interviews and lectures online at http://thesciencenetwork.org
For example:
     **  Stem Cells on the Mesa
     **  20 Jan 2011 Barzilai and Cuervo on The Science Network
     **  Interview with Paul F. Glenn
Poster and oral presenters might wish to deposit their posters and slides in the Open Access F1000Research website, so that more people can see them.
By John D. Furber
Legendary Pharmaceuticals

http://LegendaryPharma.com/chartbg.html